THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT'S POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMMES IN NIGER STATE

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background of Study

The incidence of poverty has brought variations in living standards around the globe. Some people are fairly well off and others are not. Some individuals are considered rich and others poor. However, everything is relative and that is certainly the case with poverty. For instance, even in countries considered to be rich, we read and hear of such things as ‘Millions of Americans can’t make a decent living” (Schwarz October, 1998:14).

Similarly, a poor person in Nigeria might not be perceived as such by other Africans in dire economic needs. Thus poverty is partly a matter of how one person’s income stacks up against the other person’s and partly how one earns his living. Due to the arming increase of poverty, the Nigerian government has designed a lot of stabilization measures or programmes to curb or reduce the menace of poverty in this country. Each past administration came up with a unique programme mire in order to eradicate or alleviate poverty in Nigeria (Dike 2000:5). Some of these programmes include; General Olusegun Obasanjo’s Operation Feed The Nation of 1976, Alhaji Shehu Shagari’s Green Revolution Programme of 1979, General M. Buhari’s Operation “Go Back To Land Programme of 1983, Genral Babangida’s Directorate Of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure (DFFRI) of 1986, Genral Sani Abach’s Family Economic Advancement Programme (FEAP). Chief Olusegun Obasanjo later came back to power on May 29, 1999 and introduced another Poverty Alleviation Programme (PAP) in the year 2000 (Dike 2000:7).

The above past poverty reduction programmes yielded minimal fruit or failed dismally. Despite all these programmes, Nigeria experienced worsening poverty situations in 1980s and 1990s. The incidence of poverty increased from 46.3% of the population in 1985 to 65.6% in 1996. The dept of and severity of poverty as well as income inequality also worsened during the period (National Policy on Poverty Eradication, NNPE, December, 200:2).

The result of the failures of these programmes manifested in unemployment, lack of access to credit, rural and gender dimensions of poverty. While none of these programmes was completely without merit, none of them had a significant, lasting, or sustainable positive effect. This is because several factors hindering the success of government’s efforts to reduce the level of poverty were identified, (NEEDS 2004:33). Most of the failures of those programmes included the fact that;

1. The programmes were mostly not designed to alleviate poverty;
2. They lacked defined policy frameworks with proper guidelines for poverty alleviation;
3. They suffered from political instability, interference, policy and macroeconomic dislocations.
4. They lacked consistency as well as continuity;
5. They are riddled with corruption, political deceptions, outright kleptomania and distasteful looting, (Ali Garba, July, 28 – 29th 2006:4).

Thereafter, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo’s year 2000 Poverty Eradication Programme NAPEP), came up again with another poverty reduction programme otherwise known as National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) in 2003, whose primary aim was to create a new Nigerian citizen who values hard work and who realizes that one cannot have something for nothing. Achieving this aim may be the strongest action Nigeria can take to build a better future for its people. NEEDS is about the Nigerian people - their health, education, employment, happiness, sense of fulfillment and general well – being (NEEDS 2004:28).

The policy thrust of the NEEDS programme is not only to reform the economy in order to boost economic growth, but also to empower the people as a means of revitalizing the weakened and social pillar. Doing so calls for a human right approach to development effort. The added value envisaged by this approach is that the norms and values enshrined in it have the potential to empower the people. This is important, because it is now widely recognized that effective poverty reduction is not possible without doing so (NEEDS 2004:28).

This piece of research work has been designed to find out the impact of Government in reduction in Niger State with particular focus on Suleja Local Government Area, between 2006 and 2008. This research work will survey the extent to which participation in poverty reduction programmes in Suleja Local Government Area reduced the poverty of the poor by empowering them through: the training of women in beads making; provision of macro finance loans to the poor; and the establishment of various women/youths skills acquisition centres and many more.

1.2 Statement of Problems

Previous Governments of Nigeria initiated policies aimed at poverty reduction in Nigeria, the strategy has been to render assistance to the people (the poor), thereby alleviating some difficult situations of their lives and at the same time putting similes and adding new hopes to their lives (emphasis mine), as against their poor living conditions. Some of these government programmes on poverty reduction in Nigeria have worked fairly well in some parts of the country but in other parts of the country, they failed due to lack of continuity, political interference, the fact that the programmes were not really meant to alleviate poverty, non-implementation f government’s programmes to the letter as well as corrupt political leaders who only enriched themselves, leaving the people wallowing in abject poverty in the face of plenty (Dike 2000:3).

In Niger State, the people are mostly engaged in farming, fishing and rearing of animals. The state has the highest concentration of Dams providing Hydro electricity to the country. These dams are located in Kainji, Jebba and Shiroro. The constructions of these dams were preceded by the massive displacements of people, without their proper resettlement. And, the communities with dams also experience seasonal flooding, particularly when the river Niger over flows its banks. During such an incidence in 1999, several villages were submerged, thousands of people displaced and property worth millions of naira destroyed.

These, coupled with the neglect of communities in which dams are cited by the state and lack of adequate compensation after the flooding, turned these areas into poverty stricken environments, lacking in mostly all basic social facilities, including the electricity generated from their communities (Abdu & Mustapha, 2005:173).

1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study

The aim of the study is to examine the impact of Government’s Poverty Reduction Programmes in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives of this study were set out as follows:

1. To investigate the programme on poverty reduction in Suleja Local Government area of Niger State reduced poverty in the lives of the poor participants in that area.
2. To examine the issues of lack of continuity and consistency affect the programme.
3. To analyze the political leadership of the area that has affected this programme.

1.4 Research Questions

The following are the research questions of the study which would elicit answers:

• What are the activities of the Local Government’s Poverty Reduction Programmes in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State?
• To what extent does Local Government generate empowerment for the youth in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State?
• How would Local Government alleviate poverty in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State?

1.5 Research Hypothesis

The following hypotheses have been formulated in this study for testing:

Hypothesis One

H0: There is no significant relationship between the activities of Local Government and poverty reduction in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State.

H1: There is a significant relationship between the activities of Local Government and poverty reduction in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State.

Hypothesis Two

H0: There is no significant relationship between Local Government and empowerment of the youths in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State.

H1: There is a significant relationship between Local Government and empowerment of the youths in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger State

1.6 Scope of Study

The study focuses on the impact of Government in Poverty Reduction in Suleja Local Government Area, Niger as a case study.

1.7 Limitations of the Study

During the course of this study, many things militated against its completion, some of which are:

1. Time Constraint: The time frame given to accomplish this project was very short due to school academic calendar and it was carried out under pressure which made the researcher not to implement some necessary features.
2. Establishment Policies: Establishment policies posed a serious limitation as most staffs are not ready to release information needed for this project work. There were lots of information needed from the staffs of this institution to enhance the study which took them time to release or they did not release at all for security purposes, hence the scope was reduced.
3. Research material: availability of research material is a major setback to the scope of the study.
4. Frequent power failure: This made the researcher append more money on fuel to ensure sustainable power.

1.8 Significance of the Study

The study is relevant in the following ways;

1. This study has theoretical relevance to students of Political Science, Local Government administration, as well as practical relevance to administrators in the field. That is, it will help to really understand the impact of the poverty reduction programme on the stated target population in Suleja Local Government Area of Niger State.
2. It will also enable us understand in details the principles of continuity and consistency in government implementation of its poverty reduction programme on the poor participants in Suleja Local Government Area.
3. It will hopefully stimulate further research work on the intricacies of how the subsequent government’s programmes on poverty reduction in the Local Government and other states of the federation could achieve positive outcomes.

Besides, the study will serve as reference material for subsequent researcher in the field or related topics.

1.9 Definition of Terms

The following definition of terms of the research work;

Impact: Here, this concept means the impression or effect on something or somebody. The impression or effect can be negative or positive in nature, e.g in poverty reduction.

Government: In this study, government means the particular administration that was in place during the inception and implementation of needs as development strategies to reduce poverty in the country, state or local government areas.

Programme: The programme has been designed to create employment, wealth, happiness, sense of fulfillment, education and lots more, in order to reduce the poverty of the poor participants.

Poverty: In this context, poverty is a state of want or being poor. A state of having limited resources or nothing to satisfy unlimited wants.

Reduction: In this piece of work reduction is seen as the way of lessening the hardships of life and making life a bit manageable for the people (the poor) through some strategies.